Kevin Cramer’s Health Care Record is Downright Spooky

(BISMARCK, ND) – Kevin Cramer’s health care record is scarier than this cheesy Halloween analogy.

🧛 Cramer voted to repeal the current health care law FIVE times without a replacement.

😱 Cramer voted for the AHCA and supports Graham-Cassidy and bills like ‘skinny repeal,’ all of which could:

❌Eliminate federal funding for Medicaid expansion, which has enabled 18,000 North Dakotans to obtain coverage

❌Allow insurance companies to charge more for pre-existing conditions coverage

❌Allow states to define essential health benefits to not include health conditions like asthma, cancer, or depression

❌Implement an ‘Age Tax’ on older North Dakotans ages 50-64

😈 Cramer supports the ill-advised partisan lawsuit that would strike down patient protections in the current law, including eliminating protections for pre-existing conditions.

👻 Cramer is so afraid of North Dakotans learning the truth about his health care record that his campaign threatened constituents with physical removal when they tried to attend a ‘Set the Record Straight’ press conference on his health care record.

🎃 Because it’s an election year, Cramer is lying about his health care record, trying to convince North Dakotans that he’ll protect their care, but here’s the truth: his record is downright dangerous and North Dakotans will hold him accountable.

###

ICYMI: Cramer “Can’t Run From… Past Actions Against Protections for Pre-Existing Conditions”

(BISMARCK, ND) – Kevin Cramer can spout election-year spin all he wants, but the fact is that his votes to repeal the current health care law without a replacement and his support of the ill-advised lawsuit that would eliminate the current law would eliminate protections for pre-existing conditions. It’s that simple.

NDxPlains: They Cannot Run From Their Past Actions Against Protections for Pre-Existing Conditions
By Tyler Axness
October 26, 2018

Key Points:

  • Yes, North Dakota politicians are threatening insurance protections for pre-existing condition. Some have made repeated attempts to accomplish this but have failed due to public outrage. Now facing that outrage again during an election and as a Republican lawsuit threatens to strip away protections, they’re trying to convince voters otherwise. Don’t buy it. Six years of action speaks louder than eight months of political speak.
  • The attempts to remove and diminish protections for pre-existing conditions, reverse Medicaid expansion, and whittle away at essential health benefits has been a consistent part of Kevin Cramer’s congressional record. Though he claims the sixty plus times he voted to accomplish that was merely “symbolic” he has made it abundantly clear it is what he believes. Accusing patients with pre-existing conditions of trying to “game” the system coupled with his votes is a clear indicator. No amount of paid political advertisements can change those facts.
  • After failing to successfully throw out those federal protections and change Medicaid into a less effective block-grant program through legislation, Cramer has now fully supported a lawsuit to do just that through the courts. […] If successful, those protections are gone. The lawsuit explicitly says they will be gone just like the repeal bills Cramer supported in Congress. Period.
  • These same politicians can hold rushed press conferences orchestrated by paid political consultants to “set the record straight”all they want. It is not what they say, it is what they have done. The desperate spin in an election year shows they’ll literally say anything. They cannot run from what they’ve done, nor the facts.

Read the full article here.

###

Trick or Treat: Cramer’s Plan to Cut Social Security & Medicare is Downright Terrifying

(BISMARCK, ND) – It’s almost Halloween and we’ve got an early trick or treat challenge for you–

TRICK: Congressman Cramer is misleading North Dakotans about his plans to cut Social Security and Medicare, telling them he wants to protect these programs and that calls for changes such as means testing and raising the retirement age are small and wouldn’t change the program for those currently enrolled.

TREAT: Experts say these changes “could be interpreted as calls for cuts” and Cramer himself has stated that “everything [is] on the table” when it comes to making changes to Social Security.

###

QUICK CLIP: Conservative Columnist: Cramer’s False Promise to Protect Pre-existing Conditions is “Preposterous”

(BISMARCK, ND) – Kevin Cramer’s health care hypocrisy was in the spotlight this weekend following the final U.S. Senate debate, with conservative columnist Jennifer Rubin pointing out that Cramer’s sudden about-face with regard to preserving these protections is “preposterous.”

WATCH:

Key Quotes:

Joy-Ann Reid: “They voted like 70 times to repeal Obamacare root and branch and now they’re like, ‘oh no we love Obamacare.’”
…
Jennifer Rubin: “The lawsuit does not offer pre-existing conditions support.”
…
This is preposterous.
…
If you want to be extremely charitable, their lie is hanging on [state reinsurance plans], but that is not a replacement for pre-existing protections, as just about everybody has said.”

###

 

NOTHING TO SEE HERE: Cramer Tries Masking His Plan to Cut Social Security, Medicare

(BISMARCK, ND) – Kevin Cramer is desperately trying to convince North Dakotans that he won’t destroy their Social Security and Medicare, using weasel words to mask his intention to gut these vital programs. Unfortunately for him, his election-year spin won’t work on North Dakotans.

In an op-ed yesterday, Cramer said he doesn’t want to “cut benefits for people currently receiving Social Security or Medicare benefits or for anyone over the age of 55” – but he makes no mention of those North Dakotans who have paid into the program for decades but are 54 years old or younger.

And in last week’s debate, Cramer unequivocally stated that “everything [is] on the table” when it comes to making changes to Social Security.

See the previous times Cramer has called for making changes to these earned benefits.

  1. In an interview with the Jamestown Sun, Cramer advocated for raising the retirement age and making cuts to programs like Medicare.
  2. In a town hall sponsored by AARP, Cramer made clear his plans to make cuts to North Dakotans’ hard-earned retirement funds, saying, “President Trump – ironically, here’s one of the areas that he and I don’t agree on. He will not touch – he promised not to touch Social Security.”
  3. Later that same week, Cramer doubled down, saying, “he [President Trump] has pledged not to deal with Social Security and Medicare. I think that’s a mistake.”
  4. Cramer also said he was “encourag[ed]” by Mitch McConnell’s desire to cut Social Security and Medicare.

###

Heidi Dominates Final Debate, While Cramer Continues Lying to North Dakotans about His Record

(BISMARCK, ND) – There was one clear winner in tonight’s debate: Senator Heidi Heitkamp. Heidi demonstrated that she’ll always stand up for North Dakota’s interests – but Kevin Cramer? He’s looking out for himself and his Washington, D.C. bosses.

There’s no greater evidence of this than health care:

HEITKAMP: “Let’s not fool ourselves, let’s just not fool ourselves. When you vote five times to repeal the Affordable Care Act where that patient protection exists, you have voted to eliminate that patient protection. When you support a lawsuit where that sole purpose is to eliminate the protection for pre-existing conditions, you don’t support protections for pre-existing conditions.”

On every issue, Heidi will stand up for North Dakota’s interests while Cramer will continue to lie to North Dakotans. Unfortunately for him, we’re here to hold him accountable for his lies:

Cramer diminished North Dakotans’ concerns over trade war, but the reality is that North Dakota farmers, ranchers, and manufacturers are hurting from these reckless policies.

Cramer continued his political double talk on cutting Social Security & Medicare. But the truth is he’s advocated for changes such as means testing and raising the retirement age are no different than cuts.

Cramer repeatedly misled North Dakota about his dangerous health care agenda. But the truth is Cramer voted 65 times to repeal or undermine the current health care law, including five times to repeal the law without a replacement plan, which would have completely wiped out patient protections for pre-existing conditions.

Cramer continued to “distort” Heidi’s record on immigration and border security. But the truth is Heidi has always had a law-and-order approach to immigration and border security. She’s worked to strengthen our borders in a practical, fiscally responsible way.

BOTTOM LINE: While Heitkamp has a proven bipartisan record of results for North Dakotans, Kevin Cramer’s record is anti-North Dakota – and no amount of election year spin can change that.

Read more here.

###

CROOKED CRAMER’S CHRONICLES – FINAL DEBATE TONIGHT – QUADRUPLING DOWN ON CUTTING SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE – STICKY FINANCES – CRAMERCARE

Welcome to Cramer’s Chronicles where, every Friday, we’ll break down the latest and greatest weekly hits about Cramer’s crooked, self-serving, extreme, and gaffe-prone behavior that puts himself and his partisan politics ahead of North Dakotans.

FINAL DEBATE TONIGHT. The second** and final debate between Heidi and Kevin Cramer is tonight at 7PM CT. To save everyone from an inbox full of emails at the end of the night, the Dem-NPL and Team Heidi are relaunching its rapid response website: demnpl.com/teamheididebatehq. Make sure to follow along for the latest #NDSenDebate updates!

**Quick reminder that there are only two Senate debates because Kevin Cramer declined 7 and was too chicken to reschedule a third previously scheduled debate in early October.

HEIDI’S WINNING MOMENT FROM THE 1ST DEBATE. A must-watch:

HEITKAMP: “I think it’s, I think it’s interesting that Congressman Cramer talks about President Trump. Why not talk about what you’ve done? Why not talk about your accomplishments? Why not talk about your… bipartisan credibility? Because when you look at rankings, no matter what he says, I am 50th most conservative and 49th most liberal and political thought right now is like a dumbbell. There’s hard right and hard left. Congressman Cramer is going to be on the hard right. There’s connective tissue in between that stops gridlock and that’s the moderates like me who try and get things done and do get things done.”

QUADRUPLING DOWN ON CUTTING SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE. In just the last two weeks, Cramer has four times proposed gutting Social Security and Medicare to pay for his massive tax cut to the wealthy.

  1. In a recent interview with the Jamestown Sun, Cramer advocated for raising the retirement age and making cuts to programs like Medicare.
  2. In a town hall sponsored by AARP, Cramer made clear his plans to make cuts to North Dakotans’ hard-earned retirement funds, saying, “President Trump – ironically, here’s one of the areas that he and I don’t agree on. He will not touch – he promised not to touch Social Security.”
  3. Later that week, Cramer doubled down, saying, “he [President Trump] has pledged not to deal with Social Security and Medicare. I think that’s a mistake.”
  4. Cramer also said he was “encourag[ed]” by Mitch McConnell’s desire to cut Social Security and Medicare.

CRAMER’S STICKY FINANCES. At the last debate Cramer became “uneasy” whenever the subject of his finances came up. Maybe his self-serving agenda can give us a clue as to why…

CRAMERCARE WOULD MAKE HEALTH CARE MORE EXPENSIVE FOR NORTH DAKOTANS. Cramer told the Williston Herald that his health care agenda “would look like” skinny repeal or Graham-Cassidy, but here’s what that could do to North Dakotans’ care:

❌Eliminate federal funding for Medicaid expansion, which has enabled 18,000 North Dakotans to obtain coverage

❌Allow insurance companies to charge more for pre-existing conditions coverage

❌Allow states to define essential health benefits to not include health conditions like asthma, cancer, or depression

❌Implement an ‘Age Tax’ on older North Dakotans ages 50-64

Don’t forget: Cramer also voted to repeal or undermine the current health care law 65 times and supports a partisan lawsuit that seeks to repeal the law entirely. He’s repeatedly broken his promise to North Dakotans to protect their care. 

CRAMER SURROGATE TO FARMERS: YOU DON’T GET IT. Another week, another instance where Cramer and his campaign are belittling North Dakotans’ concerns over the trade war. A campaign surrogate claimed that farmers concerned over the trade war “don’t understand the big picture” and “should actually be happy.” 🤔

DEM-NPL LAUNCHES GOTV WEBSITE. North Dakotans can visit demnpl.com/vote as a resource to vote by mail, find their polling location, pledge to vote, make a plan to vote, and learn about voting ID requirements.

From our Executive Director: “Every election comes down to turnout and that’s why the Dem-NPL is committed to making sure North Dakotans have the tools necessary to make their voices heard. The resources this website offers is just one of the many ways, in addition to our voter hotline and our extensive campus and native organizing efforts, that we’re working to make voting foolproof for eligible North Dakotans.”

TWEET OF THE WEEK.

###

#TBT One Week Ago: Cramer’s Worst Debate Moments

(BISMARCK, ND) – One week ago U.S. Senator Heidi Heitkamp and Congressman Kevin Cramer met to debate for the first time and, unfortunately for Cramer, they get to do it again tomorrow. Who knows what the second and final debate will hold for Cramer, but we’ve got our dictionary ready just in case. To get you ready, here are Cramer’s worst moments from the first debate.

1. Cramer lied to the people of North Dakota about “CramerCare” and his health care agenda when he said that none of the bills he supports allows insurers to deny coverage or charge higher premiums to folks with pre-existing conditions.

MODERATOR: “If elected, will you support or oppose any bills that allow insurers to deny coverage or charge higher premiums to people with pre-existing conditions, reinstitute lifetime or annual caps or weaken benefit such as coverage for prescription drugs?

CRAMER: I would not, and I have not.”

** Fact Check: This is false and has been debunked by the Washington Post and PolitiFact.

2. Cramer was desperate for a dictionary, confusing “censure” and “censor” before lecturing the moderator.

MODERATOR: “What responsibility does Congress have to censure the President’s continued attacks on freedom of the press?

CRAMER: Now I never thought I’d hear a serious journalist suggest that we censor the president’s speech.”

His gaffe was so bad that the moderator felt compelled to clarify her original question:

MODERATOR 1: “I’m sorry. Just want to clarify the word was censure, not to censor.

3. Cramer once again compared standing up for North Dakotans against the trade war to treason.

CRAMER: “I’ll tell you one thing I haven’t done. I haven’t stood with China against our farmers. I haven’t stood with Canada against our farmers. I haven’t stood with Mexico against our farmers. When our president picks the tools that he’s going to use, I think we’re obligated to stand with the United States of America. The best way to end the trade war quickly is to be unified on our side, not on the other side.”

Remember the time he referred to Heidi as an “enemy of our own country” when she took farmers to visit the Mexican Embassy to mitigate the harm being done to North Dakota farmers.

And in case you needed reminding why Heidi won the debate and will win on November 6th, watch her highlight her record of bipartisan results for North Dakota:

HEITKAMP: “I think it’s, I think it’s interesting that Congressman Cramer talks about President Trump. Why not talk about what you’ve done? Why not talk about your accomplishments? Why not talk about your… bipartisan credibility? Because when you look at rankings, no matter what he says, I am 50th most conservative and 49th most liberal and political thought right now is like a dumbbell. There’s hard right and hard left. Congressman Cramer is going to be on the hard, right? There’s connective tissue in between that stops gridlock and that’s the moderates like me who try and get things done and do get things done.”

###

 

More Political Doublespeak from Cramer on the Trade War

(BISMARCK, ND) – Kevin Cramer continues to engage in political doublespeak as he attempts to have it both ways on the trade war. But a quick look at Cramer’s comments – and his record – demonstrate what North Dakotans already know: Cramer will blindly stand with the administration to increase his political capital, regardless of how it impacts North Dakotans.

NOW: Cramer admits there are farmers “hurting, no question about it, in the short-term.”

THEN: Cramer says in agriculture that “the short-term is the long-term […] and just one season can ruin a farmer’s livelihood.”

And while Cramer has told farmers that they need to hang tough in the face of “short-term pain,” a source familiar with the administration’s thinking says the trade war with China is at the “beginning of the beginning.”

See more:
Forum: North Dakota agribusinessman tells Pence he can’t sell enough grain
Bismarck Tribune: North Dakota to lose a lot in trade war
Agweek Editorial: “No one wins in a trade war, even when you try to fix it with a bandage”
Agweek: Economist: Prolonged trade war threatens North Dakota economic growth
AgWeek: The flood is coming: Tariff trade war could swamp soy growers when they’re down
CNBC: Soybean and pea farmers scramble as China and European trade missions cancel visits
KVRR: Farmers Speak Out Against Rep. Kevin Cramer and His Comments on Trade War
Forum: Letter: Steel tariffs are hurting small North Dakota businesses
Forum: Trade war: North Dakota soybean elevators, farmers looking for places to sell crop
Bismarck Tribune: Farmers wonder how ag ‘bailout’ for farmers affected by trade war will work
Forum: Local grain bin dealer says customers feeling tariff squeeze
MyNDNow: New Farm Bill Could be Affected by International Trade Wars
KVRR: Farmers Feeling Effects of Trade War, Farmer Bailout
USA Today: Boat maker, farmer, auto parts CEO feel the pain of a growing trade war under Trump
Forum: ND ag equipment maker feeling sting of trade war
KVRR: China Trade Dispute Results in No Bids on Soybeans
Axios: 11 million U.S. workers are in the trade war’s crosshairs
Associated Press: US trade deficit widened to $50.1 billion in July
Time: China’s New Threat Against Trump Has Some U.S. Farmers Nervous
Real Clear Politics: Trade Deal — or Lack of One — Is Key in N.D. Senate Race
Forum via AgWeek: ND ag equipment maker feeling sting of trade war
KVRR: China Trade Dispute Results in No Bids on Soybeans
Bismarck Tribune: North Dakota soybeans struggle to find market
Forum: Letter: Steel tariffs are hurting small North Dakota businesses
Cavalier County Republican: Soybean woes: from bad to worse in Cavalier County
Williston Herald: Soybeans are stuck
Grand Forks Herald via Washington Post: With jump in soybean output, ND finds itself in the eye of a trade storm
Farm Bureau: As Harvest Marches On, Tariff Pain to Follow
NPR: Soybean Farmers Worry About Tariffs’ Impact
Washington Post: China cancels trade talks with U.S. as new Trump tariffs loom
Associated Press: As aid checks go out, farmers worry bailout won’t be enough
Dickinson Press: Grain companies seek extra storage as trade war continues
Fox Business: Farmers fear China will never return to the US soybean market
Foreign Policy: Trump’s Trade War With China Could Hit Energy Exports
Bloomberg: Tariffs Start to Drag on U.S. Economy as Trade Deficit Widens
CNBC: US trade deficit widens to $53 billion as soybean exports plummet amid China trade battle
Washington Post via AgWeek: As Trump settles scores with China, American farmers pick up tab
Agweek: Grain grading among the later issues negotiated in USMCA; Canadian officials say Cramer’s comments didn’t help
CNBC: Farmers struggle to store crops as US tariffs start to take their toll
PBS NewsHour: Farmers Speak Out Against the Trade War
CNBC: ‘Refugee’ soybeans in the Dakotas seek a home after China stops buying because of the trade war
Forum: ND ag bankers riding the ‘black swan’: Soy tariff damage will last up to 5 years, economist says
Washington Post: North Dakota soybean farmers, caught in trade war, watch the season run out on their crop
NBC News: Trade off: China soybean imports set for biggest drop in 12 years amid tariff conflict
Forbes: China Stops Buying U.S. Oil, Two Months After Record Total

###

CramerCare Doesn’t Add Up to Same Health Care Protections As Current Law

(BISMARCK, ND) – In case you missed it, Politifact looked at why Republican health care proposals, such as the kind voted on and supported by Kevin Cramer, “are not as air tight as” the current health care law:

  • The current guarantee. In the old days, insurance companies had ways to avoid selling policies to people who were likely to cost more than insurers wanted to spend. They might deny them coverage outright, or exclude coverage for a known condition, or charge so much that insurance became unaffordable. The Affordable Care Act boxes out the old insurance practices with a package of legal moves.
  • Words vs. actions [… T]he protections in the GOP plans are not as strong as Obamacare. One independent analysis found that the [AHCA] left over 6 million people exposedt o much higher premiums for at least one year.
  • [A] s things stand, the latest official move by the administration has been to agree that the guarantees in the Affordable Care Act should go. It said that in a Texas lawsuit tied to the individual mandate. […] In particular, they argued that with a toothless mandate, the judge should terminate protections for pre-existing conditions. […] So, if the mandate goes, so does guaranteed-issue.
  • Latest Republican plan has holes. […] The legislation borrows words directly from the Affordable Care Act, saying insurers “may not establish rules for eligibility” based on health status, medical condition, claims experience or medical history. But there’s an out. The bill adds an option for companies to deny certain coverage if “it will not have the capacity to deliver services adequately.” To Allison Hoffman, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania, that’s a big loophole. “Insurers could exclude someone’s preexisting conditions from coverage, even if they offered her a policy,” Hoffman said. “That fact alone sinks any claims that this law offers pre-existing condition protection.”
  • [T]he bill also gives companies broad leeway in setting premiums. While they can’t set rates based on health status, there’s no limit on how much premiums could vary based on other factors.
  • Past Republican plans also had holes. Whitlock said more broadly that Republicans have struggled at every point to say they are providing the same level of protection as in the Affordable Care Act. “And they are not,” Whitlock said. “It is 100 percent true that Republicans are not meeting the Affordable Care Act standard. And they are not trying to.”

Read the full report here.

Don’t forget, Cramer has attempted to rewrite his dangerous health care record, signing onto toothless resolutions that don’t actually provide protections for pre-existing conditions. He’s also misled North Dakotans about his record’s impacts, receiving “Three Pinocchios” for his false claim that the health care bill he voted for guarded against price discrimination for folks with pre-existing conditions.

WATCH more on Cramer’s empty health care promises here.

###

❌👻 Beware of “CramerCare” ❌👻

(BISMARCK, ND) – Kevin Cramer says his health care agenda “would look like” skinny repeal or Graham-Cassidy, but the reality is much spookier. “CramerCare” would be a disaster for North Dakotans – a fact that the Williston Herald, in their reporting on Cramer’s health care agenda – made sure to point out.

  • “Other reports, however, show Graham-Cassidy would be a net loss for several states, including North Dakota, once federal funds provided to states for Medicaid expansion are included. An estimate published by Politico, prepared by Avalere Health, showed North Dakota losing up to $10 billion in funding from 2020 to 2026.
  • But the bill also lets states get waivers to price premiums based on an individual’s health care status. That’s similar to the situation prior to the ACA, when premiums for those with pre-existing conditions were too expensive for most.”

Here’s how else “CramerCare” could harm North Dakotans:

❌Eliminate federal funding for Medicaid expansion, which has enabled 18,000 North Dakotans to obtain coverage

❌Allow insurance companies to charge more for pre-existing conditions coverage

❌Allow states to define essential health benefits that to not include health conditions like asthma, cancer, or depression

❌Implement an ‘Age Tax’ on older North Dakotans ages 50-64

Reminder: Cramer also voted to repeal or undermine the current health care law 65 times and supports a partisan lawsuit that seeks to repeal the current law. He’s repeatedly broken his promise to North Dakotans to protect their care.

###

QUICK CLIP: Cramer and GOP’s “Revisionist History” on Health Care

(BISMARCK, ND) – Kevin Cramer and his colleagues are called out for their “revisionist history” when it comes to taking away coverage for pre-existing conditions and protecting access to affordable health care.

WATCH:  

Transcript:

John King: “…I’m not for taking away coverage for pre-existing conditions, that’s what all the Republicans are saying. However, they have the House and Senate majority – they didn’t pass anything as they were trying to repeal Obamacare, they didn’t pass anything to preserve the pre-existing condition coverage. And the Trump administration is trying to let insurers sell policies that don’t have pre-existing condition coverage.”

Abby Phillip: “Yeah, it’s hard for me to see this flying, really. Even if you haven’t been paying attention to politics, you understand the basic contours of the health care fight for the last six years, which is repeal Obamacare on the Republican side and preserve Obamacare on the Democratic side, and a key part of that is pre-existing conditions. This revisionist history on Republican’s part, I think it’s… truly, I don’t think voters are stupid. It’s not going to be difficult for them to understand.”

###